Abstract:
A framework for statistical comparison between analytical and experimental structural loads has been developed and applied to approximately 100 counters within the UH-60A Airloads test program. This framework relies on established structural load variability methods with novel applications to analytical structural load development maneuver time transient analysis. The analytical results are from Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis System (RCAS) spanwise structural loads developed with hub load and spanwise aerodynamic loads prescribed. RCAS consistently under predicted the Coefficient of Variation (COV) associated with spanwise Normal bending when compared to flight data. This resulted in significant scale factors required to achieve a μ+2σ reliability for structural load development. RCAS results for Edgewise bending scale factors proved slightly better than Normal bending in addition to more even over / under prediction of COV when compared to flight data.